facebook pixel
Skip to main content
CEU IAM Business School
en
 | 
es
Training Offer
News
Innovation and Society
Services CEU IAM
Meet IAM
Virtual Campus
TV
en
 | 
es
Training Offer
MBAs
Masters
Executive Programmes
Advanced Programmes
Focused Programmes
Executive Summer School
News
Blog
Events
Innovation and Society
Healthcare Trends Lab Observatory
CEU DHR COL-HUB Observatory
Francesco Economy
Services CEU IAM
Subsidies and Grants
Admissions
Alumni Network
Professional Careers
Custom Programmes
Leadership, Ethics and Talent
Meet IAM
About Us
Contact
Competitors joined by a 'win-win' situation

Competitors joined by a "win-win" situation

CEU IAM
 / 
CEU IAM Blog
 / 
International Business
 / 
Competitors joined by a "win-win" situation
Share it 
Share it - LinkedIn Share it - Facebook Share it - Whatsapp Share it - Twitter
Rating 
Competitors joined by a "win-win" situation
  
 50 % 
  
 50 % 
  
 0 % 
  
 0 % 
  
 0 % 
Rating 

Monday, 9 november 2020 | Redacción CEU

Commercial agreements, conventions, committees or associations are only a few examples of the many different shapes alliances may take. Regardless of their format, all of them have as their goal a greater good. The idea is that two companies (or more depending on the case) are stronger than one, and this contributes to multiplying their chances of success. The objective of these partnerships is to lead to a win-win situation. However, can everyone win after striking up alliances with direct competitors? Are these types of alliances safe?


Last week, Burger King surprised the whole world by asking their customers on the official UK Twitter account to order food from its direct competitors. While recognizing that this was something they would have never thought of asking, they started their statement by saying: <<Order from McDonald’s>>. They were not satisfied with just that; they encouraged ordering from other brands specializing in this type of food: KFC, Subway, Domino’s Pizza, Pizza Hut, Five Guys, Greggs, Taco Bell, Papa John’s, Leon and so on. They even asked to do so from businesses they had not mentioned. Why did they do it? It was their way of asking for support for restaurants due to the new measures which were adopted to combat the spread of COVID-19.

Actually, this is not a strategic alliance, but rather an action on its own, since we understand that Burger King did not agree on this statement with any of its direct competitors. However, this action serves as an example to explain how historic rivals can bury their hatchets at certain times. They can do it at specific times, in longer periods or even permanently. Its purpose is always to achieve a greater good. In the case of Burger King, it was about managing to reduce the impact of the crisis on their businesses and launching a message of support and solidarity.

Alliances with your "enemies" 

Surely you remember that line of Michael Corleone in The Godfather II that went: <<Keep your friends close, but your enemies closer>>. In this case, we are not talking about possible betrayals, conspiracies or bad wishes. Although competition can sometimes be hard, we prefer to talk about rivals and, better yet, competitors. And when we talk about being close, we mean creating alliances, rather than keeping a permanent state of vigilance, tension and, by no means, being willing to "pull the trigger".

Throughout history, many companies have created strategic and commercial alliances. We find, for example, cases like Starbucks and United Airlines. Both companies came together to serve only Starbucks coffee on board. In this way, it contributed to positioning the brand as a premium service and Starbucks achieved a new distribution channel. More recent is the alliance between the companies Renault, Nissan and Mitsubishi. With this union, the companies reduce costs and improve their processes by distributing the development of both their models and technologies. On the other hand, they also give leadership up to one of the brands in each region. It is a particularly interesting alliance, since it involves direct competitors -but we will come back to it later-.
 

Competitors joined by a 'win-win' situation

The decision of allying with a rival

When entering into an alliance, it is necessary to weigh the pros and cons of this decision first. Without a doubt, a key element of these partnerships is trust. You have to ask yourself to what extent your brand is willing to share certain information and, above all, with whom it will do so. It is also convenient to take into account the loss of control in certain processes, the possible misalignments related to values and company culture, communication problems, etc. However, strategic alliances also have many advantages. For example, an alliance can open up the door to a foreign market, which is something that would otherwise be very difficult to achieve. It might also be useful to have a deep knowledge of clients, develop new products, have access to new technologies and achieve a greater investment capacity, among others.

Now that we are familiar with many of the advantages and disadvantages of alliances, we can understand that it is a question of balancing interests, but what about alliances between direct competitors. In the case of Starbucks and United Airlines, the allies work in completely different sectors, so their interests are more difficult come into conflict. Nevertheless, in the second example, the automotive brands are direct competitors. In this case, it is an alliance that pursues a greater good and, therefore, the companies are willing to make big concessions such as sharing the markets.

An association with a competitor may become really effective. However, it will depend on many factors and, of course, it will not be risk-free. Logically, one runs greater risks than when collaborating with a company that works in another sector, country or that does not share the same commercial goals. 

The success of the alliance will largely depend on their members’ behavior, proportionality and reciprocity. Therefore, it is better not to proceed when brands consider that the interests are not appropriate, there is key hidden information related to the union or a good relationship of trust is not going to be established. Its success will also depend on the formula they choose, that is, whether it is a temporary or permanent alliance, whether it is superficial or deep, etc. They have to be aware of the extent to which today's allies may be tomorrow's rivals. At the same time, they must carefully consider what measures are described in the agreement and, therefore, what information will be shared.

Likewise, it is essential to design a clear and shared strategy. Otherwise, the chances that everything will fail can be high. Finally, it must be taken into account that, as a general rule, alliances do not remain in just one specific alliance; they are usually the first step towards something bigger.

If you are a professional with four or more years of experience, you are interested in topics like this and you are ready to boost your career, we invite you to discover our Executive MBA. With this training program, you will develop your skills across all the areas of the company, paying special attention to your training in key aspects such as innovation models, digitization, entrepreneurship, social responsibility and managerial skills.

☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
Rate this article

Also interesting for you

Also interesting for you: Executive MBA (EMBA)
Executive MBA (EMBA)
Also interesting for you: CEU International MBA
CEU International MBA
Share it 
Share it - LinkedIn Share it - Facebook Share it - Whatsapp Share it - Twitter

Related articles

Related articles: The reasons of business internationalization

Monday, 7 may 2018

The reasons of business internationalization

What reasons are crucial when making the decision to internationalize a company? How to find the perfect formula and the right time to do it?

Related articles: The truth of dumping

Monday, 20 may 2019

The truth of dumping

The terms "dumping" and "antidumping" frequently appear in the media. Do we know what they mean? What do these international trade strategies consist of?

Related articles: Taking the leap in company with a joint venture

Monday, 16 april 2018

Taking the leap in company with a joint venture

Entering a new market is an ambitious goal. Many companies decide to join forces to reach it. What is the adventure of the "joint venture"?

CEU IAM Business School is the CEU group Business School
Universidad CEU San Pablo
Universitat Abat Oliba CEU
Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera
Leadership

The common denominator of CEU IAM programs is Leadership. Fruit of which maintains a unique alliance in Spain with the Center for Creative Leadership. Currently, one of the best leadership programs in the world is taught in all its executive courses.

CEU IAM understands that there is a great need to train professionals capable of leading their organizations in a changing, digital and international environment. Managers are needed to lead the changes, inside and outside their borders, and to generate a positive and profound impact on people and organizations.

Center for Creative Leadership

 

AACSB International
CEU Institute for Advanced Management is a member of AACSB International
(Association to Advanced Collegiate Schools of Business)

 

Asociación Católica de Propagandistas
El CEU es una obra de la Asociación Católica de Propagandistas

 

Madrid Excelente

+34 915 140 445 CEU IAM phone: +34 915 140 445
+34 670 058 726 CEU IAM whatsapp: +34 670 058 726
secretaria[@]iamceu.com CEU IAM email: secretaria[@]iamceu.com
Legal Warning and Data Protection
Social Media Policy
General Conditions of Contract
Cookies Policy
Institutional Ethical Channel
Training Cycles Madrid
Web Map
CEU IAM en LinkedIn CEU IAM en YouTube CEU IAM en Facebook CEU IAM en Instagram CEU IAM en Twitter
x
x
x
x